Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/init.php on line 43 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/init.php on line 91 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/init.php on line 95 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/init.php on line 103 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/init.php on line 114 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/init.php on line 118 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/init.php on line 126 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/init.php on line 195 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/init.php on line 402 Strict Standards: Declaration of vB_Database_MySQLi::db_connect() should be compatible with vB_Database::db_connect($servername, $port, $username, $password, $usepconnect) in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/class_core.php on line 1106 Strict Standards: Declaration of vB_Database_MySQLi::select_db_wrapper() should be compatible with vB_Database::select_db_wrapper($database = '', $link = NULL) in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/class_core.php on line 1106 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/class_core.php on line 2330 Deprecated: Function set_magic_quotes_runtime() is deprecated in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/class_core.php on line 1505 Strict Standards: Non-static method vB_Session::fetch_substr_ip() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/class_core.php on line 1589 Strict Standards: Non-static method vB_Shutdown::init() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/ronconte/catholicplanet.net/html/forum/includes/class_core.php on line 2333 Why the attack on New York City? [Archive] - CatholicPlanet.Net discussion group

PDA

View Full Version : Why the attack on New York City?


Ron Conte
16th November 2009, 07:55 PM
Why is New York City the target of an attack by the Arab/Muslim extremists, that begins World War 3?

It is difficult to say what motivates the extremists to attack New York City, rather than some other city or target. It may be partly because they had a 'successful' previous attack there on 9-11-2001. It may be partly because it is one of the major cities of western society, and the most populous city on the East Coast, and a major financial center. It may be partly because New York City has a high percentage of Jewish residents.

But it might also be partly because of the trials that are scheduled for Gitmo detainees in New York City. Certainly, many of these detainees will be found guilty, and be given long prison sentences, and some might be given the death penalty.

Lazarus
16th November 2009, 08:48 PM
they already hit New York, and this city with the giant Hollywood sign on a hill might be the next, after all, my area, San Fernando Valley is the porn capital of the US. That's why, every single day, I always pray to the Blessed Mother of God to protect us, especially my loved ones!

CB
17th November 2009, 12:25 AM
I agree with Ron. The extremists have already attacked N.Y. twice, at the same location. These latest developments, as to their trial being held there, only lends credence to the speculative calendar that Ron has developed.

js1975
17th November 2009, 08:07 PM
There are a lot of reasons they would attack NYC:

1. Financial capital of the U.S. (and until recently the world)
2. Highly populated (one of the most populated in the country)
3. Wall Street
4. United Nations
5. The most admired U.S. city
etc.....

As I understood it in the past, the real goal of Bin Laden was to cripple the U.S. so that we no longer supported Israel. The most direct way of doing that from a terrorist attack would be to bring down New York, which was the financial capital of the world. (London now outranks NYC)

-jay

Dan A
17th November 2009, 08:09 PM
That was the first thing I thought of when I heard about the trials. You have a bunch of terrorist who wish for death so they may go to their reward. A reward that has been delayed now for several years and the trials will only add to it. I wouldn't be surpised if some of their brothers attempt to speed up the process. It would be a great victory for them on several accounts.

sammy
27th January 2010, 07:34 PM
As to the inhabitability of NYC after the explosion, if it were a "low" yield detonation, the outlying boroughs would remain relatively intact but might have to be abandoned. Many residents of Northern NJ would also want to abandon their homes. The volume of displaced people would overwhelm civility. There will be many opportunities to perform charitable acts of mercy as the number of people relocating will be in the millions.

Shane
27th January 2010, 10:53 PM
The more I think about it, the more grave this scenario seems to become. I think we, as both members and non-members who know of this prediction, are in the unfortunate position of awaiting such an event but not really able to do anything widespread about it. People would scoff if news of this prediction got out after the Warning, while it would cause alarm and panic to others if the media got hold of it. It's hard to accept that many will die but without us being able to practically do very much about it.

sammy
28th January 2010, 01:30 AM
I still believe it would be a good idea for someone or a group to walk the city and lay down a track of blessed salt in the form of a cross in perpendicular fashion through the streets of manhattan. I think this would be best done in stealth manner so as not to draw attention. It is after all a white powdery substance. I've studied a map and 2 crosses can be laid down. The first and largest would be down 5th avenue in the upper part of the borough from Marcus Garvey Park down to Washington Square Park. This distance would be approximately 5 miles. The cross would intersect via 59th from water edge to water edge ( 2 miles). The smaller cross would be in lower manhattan from 9th at the northern end, walking down broadway, to the charging bull statue at battery place (2miles). The cross would intersect via houston street from water edge to water edge (2 miles). Maybe someone living in the city will read this after the warning and undertake this task.

TheGiftOfLife
28th January 2010, 01:48 AM
sammy please let me know about this blessed salt concept, I have never heard of it.

sammy
28th January 2010, 01:16 PM
Sacramentals are only as powerful as the belief of the person who uses them.
After the nuclear detonation, many buildings will collapse and produce a great cloud of dust that will darker manhattan. The streets will be littered with debris and many streets will become unusable and unrecognizable. Yet many people will survive this blast and they will want to escape the destruction.
Laying down blessed salt with the intention that it will assist and comfort people finding a way out of the ruins by preserving open corridors would be the intention.
The ways of God can seem like madness to the world.