CatholicPlanet.Net discussion group  

Go Back   CatholicPlanet.Net discussion group > Eschatology and Private Revelation > Predictions about the future of the Church
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22nd April 2011, 04:09 PM
Brother Brother is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,847
Default The Warning still might happen....

All the ingredients for these events to happen are still latent; therefore, it would be foolish to think that the Warning will not happen or that Garabandal is false. Unless this papacy comes to and end or unless Loey Lomangino dies without the Warning happening, then we can discredit this particular apparitions, but all what our Lady has said in Garabandal are still vivid, it is just a matter of time.

Also, we are at the threshold of the first part of the tribulation and I firmly believe this, our Mother has said this not only at Garabandal but in other true revelations from Heaven and those predictions from our Lady has been proven to be true by the current signs we are seeing in the world today. Now the question is if the tribulation will happen first (and this is what our Lady have meant at Garabandal when she said "when things are at its worst", and then, within a few time later, the Warning, and then, the war and the first part of the tribulation will continue. In other words, now the question is if the events would turn to be as follows:

First Part of the Tribulation begins (within a few time from now)
Warning
Consolation
Miracle
FPOTT continues to unfold and the Muslim world takes over
Great Monarch takes over and wins
Chastisement or Three Days of Darkness
Time of Peace
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22nd April 2011, 04:26 PM
Pontifex Pontifex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 588
Default

I guess we can now say that this will not start this year.
__________________
While awaiting these things, be diligent, so that you may be found to be immaculate and unassailable before him, in peace. 2 Peter 3:14
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22nd April 2011, 04:41 PM
Ron Conte Ron Conte is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,592
Default

I'm not going to revise my dates for these events.
Instead, I will wait and see, as events unfold, how much of my
eschatology for the First Part of the Tribulation is correct.

I know some people have suggested 2016 as a year when
the date for the feat of Bl. Imelda falls on the right day (Thurs),
but I still think that 2016 is too late a date for the start
of the tribulation.

Perhaps the tribulation will begin this year,
and the Warning/Miracle will occur later (in 2016), once
some of the events of the tribulation have unfolded.

The current turmoil in the Middle East may be lead to extremists
taking over many of those nations. If so, then WW3 moves a
step closer.
__________________
Ron Conte
Roman Catholic theologian
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22nd April 2011, 04:44 PM
daytonafreak daytonafreak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 574
Default 3 Popes prophecy

One thing nags at me about the three popes prophecy. I know I read somewhere (but I can't find a link now) that Conchita stated to someone (I think it was her mother) that when she made the three popes statement she didn't include Pope John Paul I because his reign was so short. Now, I doubt that Our Lady would have not counted this Pope but Conchita herself when talking about this statement by Our Lady might have used her own words.
In other words, this might be a statement that Conchita came up with that does not accurately reflect what Our Lady said about the subject.


Also, Ron, when you feel up to it, do you think you can share with us your thoughts about The Warning not happening this year, and what that means for your eschatology and your books, etc.?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22nd April 2011, 04:45 PM
daytonafreak daytonafreak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 574
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daytonafreak View Post
Also, Ron, when you feel up to it, do you think you can share with us your thoughts about The Warning not happening this year, and what that means for your eschatology and your books, etc.?


You answered my question before I was done typing it, LOL
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22nd April 2011, 05:52 PM
Ron Conte Ron Conte is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,592
Default

I will work on finishing my book
The Second Part of the Tribulation
which should be done by May or June some time.

I'm not going to revise my other eschatology books with new dates.
Instead, I will wait and see how these events unfold.
Then perhaps I'll write more about the first part of the tribulation.
__________________
Ron Conte
Roman Catholic theologian
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22nd April 2011, 06:09 PM
Ron Conte Ron Conte is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daytonafreak View Post
One thing nags at me about the three popes prophecy. I know I read somewhere (but I can't find a link now) that Conchita stated to someone (I think it was her mother) that when she made the three popes statement she didn't include Pope John Paul I because his reign was so short.

The three Popes prophecy, as I recall, does not specifically say three Popes and then the Warning, but rather three Popes and then these events begin. So these events would be the start of the tribulation, during either the reign of the current Pope or the next Pope.
__________________
Ron Conte
Roman Catholic theologian
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 22nd April 2011, 06:17 PM
Pontifex Pontifex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 588
Default

Ron,

Are you going to continue to teach on this forum ?
__________________
While awaiting these things, be diligent, so that you may be found to be immaculate and unassailable before him, in peace. 2 Peter 3:14
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 22nd April 2011, 06:21 PM
Pontifex Pontifex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Conte View Post

I know some people have suggested 2016 as a year when
the date for the feat of Bl. Imelda falls on the right day (Thurs),
but I still think that 2016 is too late a date for the start
of the tribulation.


So would this mean that the Miracle occurs this year or is not connected to Bl. Imelda ?
__________________
While awaiting these things, be diligent, so that you may be found to be immaculate and unassailable before him, in peace. 2 Peter 3:14
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 22nd April 2011, 09:10 PM
Ron Conte Ron Conte is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pontifex View Post
So would this mean that the Miracle occurs this year or is not connected to Bl. Imelda ?


No. The Miracle occurs after the Warning, in the same year.
So maybe they both occur in 2016, or in some other year.
But I still think that the Warning occurs on a Good Friday.

Yes, I will continue to teach in this forum.
__________________
Ron Conte
Roman Catholic theologian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.